Finger Lakes residents have strong civic health and 2 more...
Percentage of citizen population aged 18 or older who voted in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election (Voter Turnout)
Current Value
62.9%
Definition
"Percentage of citizens aged 18 or older who voted in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.
Voting collectively influences the health of our communities, and healthier communities are more likely to vote. Studies show that communities with higher voter turnout also tend to have better self-reported general health, fewer chronic health conditions, a lower overall mortality rate, and less depression.
The U.S. Constitution gives states the primary responsibility to regulate elections, meaning each state has different voting practices (e.g., access to early voting and online voter registration). Many states share a history and present reality of exclusionary laws and rules that create structural barriers to voting, such as voter registration restrictions, lack of protected time for voting, and disenfranchisement following specific interactions with the justice system. Groups disproportionately impacted by barriers to voting include people of color, people with disabilities, people with lower income, people with felony convictions, young people, and people with limited English proficiency. Low voter turnout may signal that systematic barriers reduce access to voting.
History shows that when previously disenfranchised people voted, policies that benefited all and health outcomes followed. The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution (1868) granted citizenship to formerly enslaved people, but Black Americans continued to be systematically denied voting rights. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 enforced rights for African Americans 95 years later, which increased voter turnout to 61%. From 1965 through 1971, the gap between Black and white infant mortality narrowed, and Black infant mortality declined by 40% due to the desegregation of hospitals as mandated by the Civil Rights Act. After women’s suffrage in 1920, infant mortality rates dropped dramatically due to the passage of a law setting up maternal and child health units in every state health department, expanding birth and death data collection, and supporting home-visiting initiatives. Native Americans were not granted the right to vote until 1924, after which 40 years passed before all states allowed Native Americans to vote.
The Voter Turnout data is reliable because each vote is counted. Voter turnout tends to be highest during presidential elections compared to congressional, senate, and local elections. These presidential election data provide the best national coverage at the county level. However, the data may overestimate typical levels of local civic participation."
Comparison
Story Behind the Curve
Partners
What Works
Strategy
Data Sources and Measure Methods
Data Source
"MIT Election Data and Science Lab; American Community Survey, 5-year estimates: The MIT Election Data and Science Lab is a clearinghouse for datasets that can fuel studies on elections and how they're conducted. The goal of this work is to support advances in election science by collecting, analyzing, and sharing core data and findings. Citizen Voting Age by Race and Ethnicity (CVAP) special tabulation was initially created from the Census 2000 long-form and was originally published in 2002 for use in voting rights analysis. At the request of the Department of Justice, the US Census Bureau began publishing an annual CVAP special tabulation from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates. The special tabulation and the subsequent ACS versions are all published down to the block group level of geography."
Measure Methods
-
"Voter Turnout is a percentage: Voter Turnout is the percentage of citizen population aged 18 or older who voted in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election."
-
"Voter Turnout cannot be compared across state lines: Voter turnout at the county level is heavily influenced by state laws which may restrict or support voting access, and should not be considered reflective of willingness or motivation for civic participation."
-
"Voter Turnout should be compared with caution across counties: U.S. citizenship is required to vote at the national, state, and municipal level, although citizens in the U.S. Territories are disenfranchised. As a proxy for civic participation, Voter Turnout does not reflect noncitizen contributions to a community’s civic health. Further, Voter Turnout does not reflect the civic participation of people who have lost their voting rights due to certain interactions with the judicial system or a mental disability. Voter Turnout is overestimated in places where the voting-eligible population is significantly smaller than the citizen voting-age population."
-
"Measure limitations: These data will have infrequent updates. Presidential elections occur every four years. The Voter Turnout measure calculated as the percentage of the citizen voting age population may underestimate voting participation for the voting-eligible population, which excludes people who do not hold citizenship, are mentally incapacitated or have a felony conviction (depending on state law). Voter Turnout does not directly measure civic infrastructure, such as no-excuse absentee voting, protected work flexibilities on election day, or available and accessible polling places, which supports voter participation, nor the structural barriers, including restrictions relating to voter registration, hinder voter participation. Voter turnout reflects a combination of a community’s civic participation and the privilege extended through civic infrastructure and barriers constructed to support or hinder that participation."
-
"Numerator: The numerator is the total number of people who voted in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election."
-
"Denominator: The denominator is the total number of U.S. citizens ages 18 and older."
-
"Can This Measure Be Used to Track Progress?: This measure can be used to track progress with some caveats. The data are generated from presidential elections, which occur once every four years; these infrequent data points make trend detection more difficult. Voter Turnout is affected by the laws determining who may vote and how voting occurs. Changes in these laws will impact Voter Turnout values."
Source: Voter Turnout* | County Health Rankings & Roadmaps
References
- Healthy Democracy, Healthy People. (n.d.). “Health & Democracy Index.” Accessed from https://democracyindex.hdhp.us/
- Blakely, T. A., Kennedy, B. P., & Kawachi, I. (2001). Socioeconomic inequality in voting participation and self-rated health. American journal of public health, 91(1), 99.
- Kim, D., & Kawachi, I. (2006). A multilevel analysis of key forms of community-and individual-level social capital as predictors of self-rated health in the United States. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 813-826.
- Ard, K., Colen, C., Becerra, M., & Velez, T. (2016). Two mechanisms: the role of social capital and industrial pollution exposure in explaining racial disparities in self-rated health. International journal of environmental research and public health, 13(10), 1025.
- Ballard, P. J., Hoyt, L. T., & Pachucki, M. C. (2019). Impacts of adolescent and young adult civic engagement on health and socioeconomic status in adulthood. Child development, 90(4), 1138-1154.
- Gollust, S. E., & Rahn, W. M. (2015). The bodies politic: chronic health conditions and voter turnout in the 2008 election. Journal of health politics, policy and law, 40(6), 1115-1155.
- Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (1999). Income inequality and health: pathways and mechanisms. Health services research, 34(1 Pt 2), 215.
- Ojeda, C. (2015). Depression and political participation. Social Science Quarterly, 96(5), 1226-1243.
- Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. (2019). Democracy diverted: Polling place closures and the right to vote. Accessed from http://civilrightsdocs.info/pdf/reports/Democracy-Diverted.pdf.
- Pitzer, K., Mcclendon, G. G., & Sherraden, M. (2021). Voting Infrastructure and Process: Another Form of Voter Suppression?. Social Service Review, 95(2), 175-209.
- King, B. A., & Erickson, L. (2016). Disenfranchising the enfranchised: Exploring the relationship between felony disenfranchisement and African American voter turnout. Journal of Black Studies, 47(8), 799-821.
- Shields, T. G., Schriner, K. F., & Schriner, K. (1998). The disability voice in American politics: Political participation of people with disabilities in the 1994 election. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 9(2), 33-52.
- Ancheta, A. (2006). Language Accommodation and the Voting Rights Act. Legal Studies Research Paper, (06-21).
- Parkin, M., & Zlotnick, F. (2011). English proficiency and Latino participation in US elections. Politics & Policy, 39(4), 515-537.
- Ehlinger EP, Nevarez CR. 2021. Safe and accessible voting: The role of public health. American Journal of Public Health 111(1):45-6.
- African American Pamphlet Collection (Library of Congress). (1900). To the colored men of voting age in the southern states. Accessed from https://www.loc.gov/resource/rbaapc.33200/?st=text&pdfPage=1
- Library of Congress. (n.d.). “Voting Rights for African Americans.” Accessed from https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/elections/right-to-vote/voting-rights-for-african-americans/.
- Hahn RA, Truman BI, Williams DR. 2018. Civil rights as determinants of public health and racial and ethnic health equity: Health care, education, employment, and housing in the United States. SSM Population Health 4:17-24.
- Library of Congress. (n.d.). “Voting Rights for Native Americans.” Accessed from https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/elections/right-to-vote/voting-rights-for-native-americans/.
Clear Impact Suite is an easy-to-use, web-based software platform that helps your staff collaborate with external stakeholders and community partners by utilizing the combination of data collection, performance reporting, and program planning.