Clear Impact logo

Result 1. All children grow up in safe, stable, and nurturing environments

Indicator 1.3. % of families with children 0 to 17 experiencing employment instability

Current Value

9.9%

2022

Definition

Line Bar

About the Data

This indicator includes all Census-defined families (opposite-sex married-couple families and families maintained by women and men with no spouse present) with own children 0-17 experiencing employment instability in the past year. Families experiencing employment instability are those where at least one householder is in the labor force but unemployed or no householder is in the labor force. The margin of error based on a 90-percent confidence interval is presented alongside each estimate

All quantitative data and narrative related to the data on this page was prepared by CI NOW for ReadyKidSA.

Why Is This Important?

Parental employment instability has been linked to poor academic outcomes, such as grade retention and lower educational attainment. Parental job loss can also lead to poor social-emotional outcomes for young children. Children whose mothers experience employment instability exhibit more problem behaviors, such as bullying or being withdrawn, and are more likely to be absent from school than children whose mothers hold stable jobs or voluntarily change jobs. (Urban Institute, 2013)

For more information see: http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/...

Race/Ethnicity

OVERALL TREND: Bexar County, 2013-2021                                    
  2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020* 2021 2022
Experiencing Instability 25,014 12.6% 23,914 12.0% 22,149 11.4% 23,336 11.6% 22,459 11.5% 20,189 11.0% 18,200 9.9% 22,003 11.4% 33,625   14.5% 20,512 9.9%
±2,866 ±1.4% ±2,623 ±1.3% ±2,822 ±1.4%  ±2,814 ±1.4% ±2,630 ±1.3% ±2,728 ±1.4% ±2,379 ±1.2% ±1,871 ±0.9% ±3,943   ±1.6% ±3,370 ±1.6%
  Unemployment 11,399 5.7% 10,236 5.1% 8,293 4.3% 9,255 4.6% 7,934 4.1% 7,054 3.8% 7,269 3.9% 8,757 4.5% 15,751   6.8% 7,580 3.7%
 ±1,885 ±0.9% ±1,737 ±0.9% ±1,828 ±0.9% ±1,818 ±0.9% ±1,634 ±0.8% ±1,529 ±0.8% ±1,626 ±0.9% ±833 ±0.4% ±2,814   ±1.2% ±1,849 ±0.9%
No Labor Force Participation 13,615 6.9% 13,678 6.9% 13,856 7.1% 14,081 7.0% 14,525 7.5% 13,135 7.1% 10,931 5.9% 13,246 6.8% 17,874   7.7% 12,932 6.2%
 ±2,158 ±1.1% ±1,965 ±1.0% ±2,150 ±1.1% ±2,148 ±1.0% ±2,060 ±1.1% ±2,260 ±1.2% ±1,736 ±0.91% ±941 ±0.5% ±2,762   ±1.2% ±2,818 ±1.3%
Families with Own Children 198,279 198,761 194,732 201,485 194,866 184,183 184,657 193,724 232,013 207,300
±5,518 ±6,158 ±5,781 ±5,486 ±6,371 ±6,045 ±6,745 ±3,340 ±7,773 ±7,399
Source: US Census Bureau; ACS 1-Year Estimates, Table B23007, 2013-2022. 

*ACS 2020 5-year Estimate. 1-year estimates were not available for 2020 because of the impact of COVID-19 on data collection.

                       

 

 

FAMILY TYPE: Bexar County, 2022

  Married-Couple Single Male  Single Female 
  Experiencing Instability 7,788 6.0% 2,167 10.1%  10,557 18.6%
(±1,952)  (±1.5%) (±1,125)  (±5.0%)  (±2,506)  (±4.0%)
  Unemployment 4,800  3.7%  410  1.9%   2,370    4.2%
(±1,357) (±1.0%)    (±429)   (±2.0%)   (±1,180)    (±2.0%)
No Labor Force Participation 2,988  2.3%  1,757  8.1%   8,187 14.4%
(±1,403)  (±1.1%)    (±1,040)   (±4.6%) (±2,211)   (±3.6%)
  Families with Own Children 128,978     21,560  56,762   
(±6,551)    (±3,521)   (±5,379) 
 

 

 

         

 

 

 

         

Source: US Census Bureau; ACS 1-Year Estimates, Table B23007, 2022.

Geographic Distribution

 

 

Black Population Zips:

 

Hispanic Population Zips:

 

White Population Zips:

 

 

Story Behind the Curve

What factors are pushing up on the data?

  • Fear of Losing Benefits/Assistance
  • Education/Skills
  • Transportation/Childcare 
  • Support Systems (lack of) Child Care included
  • Language Barriers
  • Family Obligations/ Cultural beliefs and practices

What factors are pushing down on the data?

  • Complex Family Structures Not Capturedafafafafafafafafa
  • Overall Decrease in Unemployment
  • Education/Skill
  • Short-term Skill Training & Certifications
  • Assistance in Job Placement
  • Increased employment opportunities at living wage
  • Increased in educational opportunities with wrap around services
  • Supports addressing the benefits cliff

Partners

  • Goodwill
  • Alamo Colleges
  • Alamo Workforce Solutions
  • Any Baby Can
  • AVANCE
  • SAHA
  • Catholic Charities
  • Employers
  • Family Service
  • Non-profits
  • Case Management programs*
  • SA Works

What Works

Evidence-Based Practices

  • SA works
  • United Way Dual Generation Programs
  • HPOG
  • Earned income disregard

Promising Practices

  • Volunteeringagagagagagagagagagagaga
  • Internships
  • School involvement
  • Childcare options
  • Family Support Services

No Cost/Low Cost Solutions

  • Policies/Systems

Outside the Box Thinking

  • Ban the Box “Ex-offender” Policy
  • Income supplements policy

Solutions and Strategies

Direct Service

  • Bringing best practices and lessons learned from the Dual Generation program model serving children and parents/caregivers on San Antonio's Eastside, to implement a two-generation model in other parts of the city and county that simultaneously strengthens educational outcomes for children ages 0 to 8 while promoting financial security for adults in the home through education and employment services

Policy

  • Develop and implement a policy that provides a phased-in approach to the benefits cliff, thereby helping families to plan for and manage increasing financial stability
  • Connected to the benefits cliff issue, encourage a grace period or an income waiver as families begin to increase their earnings, helping to offset the immediate loss of income as they cross the new economic threshold

Funding

  • Scale the dual credit model in high schools, thereby increasing pathways to the workforce for youth

Other

  • To ensure working families have access to employment services, modify service delivery models so that extended hours are also offered

Clear Impact Suite is an easy-to-use, web-based software platform that helps your staff collaborate with external stakeholders and community partners by utilizing the combination of data collection, performance reporting, and program planning.

Scorecard Container Measure Action Actual Value Target Value Tag S A m/d/yy m/d/yyyy