Percent of population that have reported intimate partner violence
Current Value
1
Definition
Story Behind the Curve
About the Data: Percent of Population That Have Reported Intimate Partner Violence
Data Description
Data Source(s):
- Numerator: Domestic Violence/Sexual Assault (DV/SA) records
- Denominator: Cherokee Indian Hospital Authority (CIHA) active user population
Used on Prior EBCI THIP:
No
Measure Definition:
Percent of the population that reported intimate partner violence:
(# of DV/SA cases reported / Total AI/AN population with at least 2+ visits in the five-county area).
Baseline (Annual):
2018:
- Percent: 1.24%
- Numerator: 146 clients assisted for DV/SA
- Denominator: 11,791
Target:
1.12% of the population reporting intimate partner violence
Target-Setting Method:
10% improvement (decrease) from baseline
Annual Data Overview
Year | Total Cases (Numerator) | Population Served (Denominator) | Percent Reporting IPV |
---|---|---|---|
2018 | 146 | 11,791 | 1.24% |
2019 | 195 | 11,813 | 1.65% |
2020 | 144 | 11,852 | 1.22% |
2021 | 186 | 12,072 | 1.54% |
2022 | 222 | 11,828 | 1.88% |
2023 | 208 | 11,815 | 1.76% |
2024* | 128 | 11,728 | 1.09% |
*As of September 13, 2024
Measure Components
Numerator:
Total number of clients assisted for DV/SA
Denominator:
Total AI/AN population with at least 2+ visits in the five-county area
Comparable National Data:
Unknown
Data Collection Frequency:
Annual
Story Behind the Curve
The percentage of individuals reporting intimate partner violence (IPV) decreased from 1.24% in 2018 to 1.09% in 2024, reflecting a slight but meaningful improvement in addressing domestic violence within the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (EBCI) community. The observed decrease can be attributed to a range of targeted initiatives, including the introduction of Lethality Assessment Screening Tools (LAP) to improve victim safety and expanded access to trauma-informed care for survivors.
Community awareness campaigns, such as training sessions and legislative reforms mandating offender accountability, created a safer environment for victims to report IPV and seek help. The data also suggests a potential underreporting in prior years, as community education and support services may have initially increased reporting before stabilizing rates.
While the numbers reflect progress, IPV remains a significant issue requiring sustained efforts, particularly in reaching underserved populations and addressing barriers to reporting.
Partners
Partners
Efforts to reduce IPV in the EBCI community involved collaboration across several sectors:
- EBCI Public Health and Human Services (PHHS): Provided trauma-informed care and coordinated community education initiatives.
- EBCI Cherokee Indian Police Department (CIPD): Implemented LAP and responded to IPV cases with enhanced protocols.
- Cherokee Indian Hospital Authority (CIHA): Delivered medical and behavioral health services tailored to the needs of IPV survivors.
- Community Advocacy Organizations: Supported victims through shelter services, counseling, and legal advocacy.
- Tribal Legal and Legislative Teams: Passed laws mandating offender accountability, including mandatory holds in elder abuse cases.
These partnerships ensured a comprehensive approach to IPV prevention and response.
What Works
What Worked
Several strategies contributed to the progress in reducing IPV reporting rates:
- Lethality Assessment Screening Tools: Equipped law enforcement and first responders with tools to identify high-risk situations and connect survivors with services.
- Victim Support Services: Expanded access to trauma-informed care and emergency shelter for IPV survivors.
- Community Awareness Campaigns: Conducted training sessions to educate the public and law enforcement about IPV dynamics and available resources.
- Legislative Reforms: Strengthened protections for survivors through mandatory holds for offenders, reducing repeat incidents.
- Collaboration Across Sectors: Partnerships between law enforcement, healthcare providers, and advocacy groups ensured victims received holistic support.
Strategy
Strategy
The strategies implemented to address IPV under the THIP included:
-
Risk Identification and Response:
- Introduced the Lethality Assessment Protocol (LAP) to assess and address high-risk cases of intimate partner violence.
-
Community Awareness and Training:
- Delivered IPV awareness training to law enforcement, healthcare providers, and the general public to improve detection and reporting.
-
Enhanced Survivor Support:
- Expanded access to trauma-informed care, emergency shelters, and counseling services for IPV survivors.
-
Legislative and Policy Reforms:
- Enacted mandatory holds for offenders to protect survivors and ensure legal accountability.
-
Data-Informed Interventions:
- Used CIHA’s DV/SA data to monitor trends, refine strategies, and allocate resources effectively.
These strategies, built on collaboration, data insights, and community engagement, contributed to improved reporting and support systems for IPV survivors.