This measure determines in in-home cases whether the mother or fatherwere involved in the development of the current child and family plan. Parent contacts, UFACET assessment information, private interviews, and child and family team meetings assist in the development of the plan. This is captured in the Case Process Review (CPR) and cases are randomly pulled where trained reviewers review the case files. Cases are scored on a "yes" or no" basis with the option of having an NA based on the question. For this item, the reviewer must locate documentation indicating that a parent was involved in the development of the child and family plan. This includes parents who refuse to participate.  

The CPR breaks this measure down into three subsets. IH.3 (A) is the mother, IH.3 (B) is the father, and IH.3 (C) is the caregiver (guardian, step-parent, kinship, etc.). 

The percentages are based on a annual August release of state-wide CPR review results from the Office of Service Review. The baseline was 87% for the mother, 68% for the father, and 82% for other caregivers from FY2024. 

This is an added measure for FY2025's Strategy 1, Objective 3 which reflects a downward trend with FY2024's scores providing a small upward trend. The low percentages from item 15, caseworker visits with parents, as well as item 13, Child & Family Involvement in Case Planning, contributes to lower percentages in involving the mother, father, and other caregivers in the development of the current child and family plan. Currently, the Division is working with each regions to evaluate their teaming efforts, as well as contact with mothers, fathers, and caregivers. For FY2026, the Division's statewide and regional RBAs will include possible solutions for consideration.